The latest post on ‘ReadWrite’ is titled “Stop Comparing Pinterest To Fancy Already”.

Lauren Orsini says, “Eight million daily uniques. Thirty-five languages. $100,000 a day in revenue. Is it time to stop comparing Fancy to Pinterest yet?

When Fancy first came on the scene in early 2012, the image-sharing community looked a lot like a certain social-media site we’d seen before. Users could pin—er, “Fancy”—items to digital image boards and then click to purchase. It was called “Pinterest for shopping.” Awed by items’ exorbitant prices, I called it “Pinterest for the 1%.”

Fancy differs from competitors on one singular concept”.

Stop Comparing Pinterest To Fancy Already

ReadWrite

Sharing is caring